

But Flowey didn't learn anything from Papyrus! He only acted the way he wanted to act, and only manipulated Paps to achieve his goals! And if he said that he changed his mind about his actions, it was a lie. More time than the one day in which the Player goes through the entire Underground on the path of the genocide, pacifist or neutral (on the path of the neutral, Flowey also says that he realized that killing isn't necessary, although the Player could kill everyone on their way). Why didn't Flowey "learn" kindness and that "killing isn't necessary" from Papyrus? They had a lot of time, apparently. If a soulless being can be made better by someone, Papyrus would be the perfect person to do it.Īnd so I have a question. He must have tried to reason with Flowey at some point.

This is very strong, as are his principles. The point is that Papyrus refuses to kill anyone because of his principles. He will be torn into small, smiling pieces. He is very strong, as Undyne describes him, but she can't take him into the Royal Guard just because he won't fight. Flowey even calls Papyrus one of the best characters to "mess around with" and that took a long time for him to get bored. Did he spend enough time with him? Yes, he did. Papyrus was friends with Flowey? Yes, he was friends with him. Flowey has the power of the resets, he played with it and so on. Remember Papyrus? This is the most kind, positive, fun and generally cool monster in the entire Underground at the time of the presence of only Flowey. Many defenders of Chara say that soulless person learns from the Player depending on the path chosen by the Player.
